General > Shows, Events and Meets
RR day at PD Tuning on Saturday 16th July- Newcastle area
Cupra R:
I'd of thought your fuel rail pressure would of been higher Dom, Revo certainly requests more. If their were more fuel then you MIGHT not get as much timing pull.
Just a guess as I'm no mapper.
You need the map sorting, wouldn't want to be running round with that much timing pull myself, although I know of others who have.
heavyd:
I was told by the mapper there is no need for more pressure, as the actual volume going into the cylinders is enough at that pressure, I asked the same thing, and he was adamant. I was under the impression that a minus number is running rich anyway. The timing was fine until I had the torque limiter raised with the dsg map, it didn't leave shark with those levels of pull.
I've been in touch wil Ben and he said he would alter the map. I thought about 4 was a nicer number to be running at :confused:
Cupra R:
--- Quote from: heavyd on July 22, 2011, 04:24:12 pm ---I was told by the mapper there is no need for more pressure, as the actual volume going into the cylinders is enough at that pressure, I asked the same thing, and he was adamant. I was under the impression that a minus number is running rich anyway. The timing was fine until I had the torque limiter raised with the dsg map, it didn't leave shark with those levels of pull.
--- End quote ---
You didn't monitor revs on the above log, what revs are you doing at the -9 pull? Is this at the same point where the torque limit has been raised?
Also, timing pull for me woud be a result of a Lean mixture rather than Rich. (maybe wrong)
Janner_Sy:
--- Quote from: heavyd on July 22, 2011, 04:24:12 pm ---I was told by the mapper there is no need for more pressure, as the actual volume going into the cylinders is enough at that pressure, I asked the same thing, and he was adamant. I was under the impression that a minus number is running rich anyway. The timing was fine until I had the torque limiter raised with the dsg map, it didn't leave shark with those levels of pull.
I've been in touch wil Ben and he said he would alter the map. I thought about 4 was a nicer number to be running at :confused:
--- End quote ---
So was the dsg limiting the timing then if it was fine after being mapped but only high after the dsg remap? Your dsg seems strange, it does all sorts of strange things to the maps.
Or is it a bad batch ofof fuel
heavyd:
I clicked on the wrong box for the 3rd set of blocks :fighting:
It was a clean rev from 2000pm to 7000rpm or so.
The dsg limits the torque by changing the timing I was told but you cant see that by that set of measuring blocks.
If I knew how much a pain the DSG would have been I would have got a manual, I only got a DSG so I wouldnt have to worry about clutches!
I logged it a couple of times now, first time was -6.5 pull, I logged it the other day with -7 to -9, but just got my laptop back, so did another log today.
At the end of the day, I'm not a mapper and only go off what I've been told :stupid:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version