All Things Mk5 > Performance Modifications

blue fin vs Shark performance

<< < (3/10) > >>

Janner_Sy:

--- Quote from: PDT on August 11, 2011, 05:58:58 pm ---
The other option is to have your car professionally custom mapped and ask them to keep both the original and tuned maps on the device, best of both worlds!   

--- End quote ---

This is what i had on'my car, but also had stage 1 and 2 files along with the imobilizer maps and bluefin stage 2+ maps that i could load onto the handset wwhen ever i wanted.  Only 3 maps could be stored on the handset at any one time.  STS handset also reads fault codes to which is handy

Sarah:
I have the blue fin stage 2 on my car and it's ok for what it is but I still feel like the car could give more. It will do for now whilst I am doing other things on the car but a custom map is on my list of things to do.  I've not had any issues with the system so can't fault it.

mortygttdi:
My bluefin handset has just given up the ghost but it like 3 years old and not sure if SC will sort it out?? Its just coming up with "Error communicating with car please contact Superchips"

Darren

heavyd:
Well having had shark, revo, bluefin, PDTuning and superchips on my car....................
I would say go with Shark. Their stage 1 map is far better than the Bluefin.
One thing that I will stress, is that if you go to stage 2+ with shark, go down to their HQ to get it done on their Rolling road and setup properly.
Out of all the above companies, bluefin was the one I wouldnt go back to.

sline:

I've had the Shark Performance map on my GT TDI 170 now for a couple of months

Have been really impressed - would definately recommend :happy2:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page