All Things Mk5 > Performance Modifications

Running 2+ - with just the downpipe and HPFP...

(1/3) > >>

berg:
Was talking to h4rdy about this and I know Janner Sy has mentioend the bare requirements for Revo several times. H4rdy enjoys his car more now without ITG/Twintake and I am considering removing mine - although I love the mid range torque the HPFP supplies on the 2+ map.

So was wondering if you remove the cai and the tbe will the car still perform a fair bit better than Stage 1 with the downpipe, intercooler and hpfp but able to put more of the power down, more of the time as there is no doubt a good CAI doe smake the car very aggressive.

Has anyone got datalogging/dyno results with the above removed? is it a daft idea? ie if you want to scale it back just go to stage 2 or even stage 1?

Any thoughts/opinions...

jon-tfsi:
I have ran mine for a while with the standard airbox on for a bit, for when it goes in for servicing. So just a decat and HPFP.

It felt great with just as much low down and mid range. I could tell it was losing a bit at higher revs though. Maybe 10 - 20 bhp

I think i would rather have stg2+ with a std airbox than stg2 with a CAI, if that makes sense.

dan930:
I'm going to get mine fitted with a milltek sports cat+downpipe & a custom remap at retech in march..can't wait

berg:

--- Quote from: jon-tfsi on February 21, 2012, 07:19:43 pm ---I have ran mine for a while with the standard airbox on for a bit, for when it goes in for servicing. So just a decat and HPFP.

It felt great with just as much low down and mid range. I could tell it was losing a bit at higher revs though. Maybe 10 - 20 bhp

I think i would rather have stg2+ with a std airbox than stg2 with a CAI, if that makes sense.

--- End quote ---


hi jon, thanks for that as that was what was wondering. so in terms of wheel hop/spin did you find it a lot more driveable in lower gears?

jimojameso:
Why does he prefer it without the cai?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page