All Things Mk5 > Performance Modifications
Custom "retard" mapping?
Markyed30:
sh*t tune like iv said 20 times cars made expected figures someone from this forum was there ill post 2nd rr results up hopefully there 270 bho like use would expect :popcornsoda:
SRC:
--- Quote from: Markyed30 on June 04, 2013, 10:21:33 pm ---sh*t tune like iv said 20 times cars made expected figures someone from this forum was there ill post 2nd rr results up hopefully there 270 bho like use would expect :popcornsoda:
--- End quote ---
I'm sorry, but I'm English. Can anyone translate?
GrayMK5GTI:
--- Quote from: Markyed30 on June 04, 2013, 10:21:33 pm ---sh*t tune like iv said 20 times cars made expected figures someone from this forum was there ill post 2nd rr results up hopefully there 270 bho like use would expect :popcornsoda:
--- End quote ---
You will learn several things on this forum:
1) dynodynamics dyno's are the only figures that people will take as remotely accurate (JKM's being the MOST).
2) dyno figures should always be taken with a pinch of salt
3) Hedge will inevitably post a picture of a sad cat. :grin:
Have you seen Saint Steves review of superchips vs R-Tech? The superchips map was asking a ridiculous amount from the turbo and inevitably putting the hardware under undue stress :surprised:
He got a smoother map with a lot less asked of the hardware.
See here, enough to put me off Superchips: http://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,65077.0.html
vRS Carl:
--- Quote from: GrayMK5GTI on June 06, 2013, 05:38:53 pm ---
--- Quote from: Markyed30 on June 04, 2013, 10:21:33 pm ---sh*t tune like iv said 20 times cars made expected figures someone from this forum was there ill post 2nd rr results up hopefully there 270 bho like use would expect :popcornsoda:
--- End quote ---
You will learn several things on this forum:
1) dynodynamics dyno's are the only figures that people will take as remotely accurate (JKM's being the MOST).
2) dyno figures should always be taken with a pinch of salt
3) Hedge will inevitably post a picture of a sad cat. :grin:
Have you seen Saint Steves review of superchips vs R-Tech? The superchips map was asking a ridiculous amount from the turbo and inevitably putting the hardware under undue stress :surprised:
He got a smoother map with a lot less asked of the hardware.
See here, enough to put me off Superchips: http://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,65077.0.html
--- End quote ---
However before said R-Tech magic dust was applied, Supperchips was the best thing since sliced bread!! :grin: :evilgrin:
xjay1337:
Anyone who knows cars wouldn't touch a Superchips or any other flash map with a bargepole! :evilgrin:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version