All Things Mk5 > Performance Modifications
Who shall I choose to remap my GTI?
dansmith180:
--- Quote from: Tazgti5 on November 04, 2014, 08:39:54 pm ---
--- Quote from: Pikey Motorsports on November 04, 2014, 08:23:37 pm --- :stupid:
--- End quote ---
More like u are :stupid:
The bloke is entitled to his own opinion
--- End quote ---
I think the :stupid: is because it went from slating to thanking and is a bit confusing. Yes everyone has their own opinion but there's a way of putting yours across without offending people.
Tazgti5:
--- Quote from: dansmith180 on November 04, 2014, 08:56:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: Tazgti5 on November 04, 2014, 08:39:54 pm ---
--- Quote from: Pikey Motorsports on November 04, 2014, 08:23:37 pm --- :stupid:
--- End quote ---
More like u are :stupid:
The bloke is entitled to his own opinion
--- End quote ---
I think the :stupid: is because it went from slating to thanking and is a bit confusing.
--- End quote ---
I back his corner, he's Entitled to his opinion and if he has apologised so be it !
He is not stupid
rtechniki:
The inlet cam maps on the tfsi are basically to gain bets effective power without compromise to emissions or mpg across the whole rpm range, oem k04 byd cdl bwj inlet maps for cold start is linked with manifold flap and injection angle to super heat the cat without nasty emission to upset tree huggers. Thats the reason your ed30 will sound like its dragging lots of air on cold start then driving at part load for the first 60 seconds or so.
The cam map is preemptive demands when requesting load and not linked to actual load conditions. (remember all the oem calibration is just around emission control not out right performance, its like runing 2200mb stock at .98 lambda is not same as when we are tuning them for power, so full demand at 2200mb a tuner would opt for .89-.88 to give preemptive heat management. Tuning for performance gives more scope unlike oem calibration where the car is allowed to run into high egts then into a fuel dump, a method which a few tuners follow for some reason?) Why not managed egt to stop them getting to hot to have to run in to protection all the time? but leave the protection there as a safe window.
cam retard aids the spooling under full load but not best power, the cam advance 28deg on oem maps is then used for best power but leads into higher egts the reason the oem map pulls back to 18deg top end rpm and load. Taking the oem intake and cat out the situation changes how these maps act, the reason a stage2 mapped car running stock cam maps at part light load sound like the are sucking really strong and getting lots of air but that air flow you can hear can not be felt in your arse as power, it seems you have to wait for the boost to build up before you feel the power ( this makes sense??) The reason for this is because the cam is retarded around -12deg. Now move that -12deg into a sweet spot which works better with the sports or decat then as soon as you hear the engine suck the air in you can also feel the power instantly.. Same with WOT demands low rpm 8deg power range 28deg and top end rpm back to 18deg, 1 issue across the whole rpm range at wot the dynamic compression ratio is change so timing maps are on a multi axis plain, 2 higher egts from the advance. So again with the cam map at wot request and full load you want to keep this in the sweet spot for power, egt and dynamic cr (the dyn_cr moves the kr knock window) Rewrite the cam maps for performance and away from the oem setup to meet the emission control. Look at your ed30 cam map below.
Most tuners just optimize the oem calibration and not rewrite like I do. Most tuners tune every car going and spend a few weeks on r&d to make it work so they can sell on, then they move on to the next ecu next car and so on. How many tuners do you know who have spent the last 10 years dedicated to just me7 med9 ecu? not many as they are now wanting to make there next big hit from the simos18 ecu and attack the mk7 r market for a few months until the next big thing/new ecu. For the last 10 years my working day and evenings have revolved around just me7 med9 study nothing more, I share my findings with many tuners for free and always help where I can.
If you know Bill b5 then you will know why I came up with TIV? He was having issues with a black TT Gt30, I went to Bill to live map it with my emulator but could not resolve the issue he was seeing on his base map which was from Vince. I then spent around 4-5weeks trying to replicate the tiv issues... which "is" an issues in every 1.8T and 3.2 me7 ecu, I found the routine which the interventions come from and removed it which gave bags more performance across the the full rpm and load range and also opened up new avenues for tuning methods. This info was passed on to Bill and other tuners for free. TIV is the name I gave my full method of tuning with the ARMD switched off. Other tuners tried to use the name TIV inc bill but they where just switching the ARMD off and not the change of methods added, the reason TIV was added as intellectual property to R-tech
As for running out of fuel at 300hp?? Who was tuning your car? plenty of fuel at 120bar on stock pump for 320+ yes you run out of fuel at 110bar.... if you forget to lift the pump maps.
As for 1.7bar being high and high egts...... what egts have you seen at 1.7bar?? because peak egt is not at peak boost on a k04 its peak rpm at all stages of tune? a stock un-tuned tuned BYD will run greater egts at full load/rpm vs a stage2+ cars egt at its 1.7bar peak @ .80 lambda.... This issues is every following everyone else lol One big name tuner maps to 1.4bar and makes it public then every other smaller non specialist tuner follows so they don't have debated on the forums..
600rpm 6500rpm
28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 10% load_rq
28.0 28.0 28.0 23.0 18.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
24.0 13.0 3.0 -2.0 -7.0 -7.0 -7.0 -7.0 -7.0 -7.0 23.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
18.0 -2.0 -7.0 -9.0 -12.0 -12.0 -12.0 -12.0 -12.0 -7.0 18.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
18.0 -2.0 -7.0 -9.0 -12.0 -12.0 -12.0 -12.0 -12.0 -7.0 18.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
18.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 -2.0 -7.0 -12.0 -12.0 -12.0 -7.0 18.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
18.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.0 -2.0 -7.0 -7.0 -2.0 8.0 18.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
18.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 8.0 13.0 18.0 23.0 28.0 28.0 23.0 23.0
18.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 13.0 18.0 18.0 28.0 28.0 18.0 18.0
18.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 18.0 28.0 28.0 18.0 18.0
18.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 18.0 28.0 28.0 18.0 18.0
18.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 18.0 28.0 28.0 18.0 18.0 170% load_rq
Tazgti5:
:signLOL:
Pikey Motorsports:
--- Quote from: Tazgti5 on November 04, 2014, 09:04:01 pm ---
--- Quote from: dansmith180 on November 04, 2014, 08:56:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: Tazgti5 on November 04, 2014, 08:39:54 pm ---
--- Quote from: Pikey Motorsports on November 04, 2014, 08:23:37 pm --- :stupid:
--- End quote ---
More like u are :stupid:
The bloke is entitled to his own opinion
--- End quote ---
I think the :stupid: is because it went from slating to thanking and is a bit confusing.
--- End quote ---
I back his corner, he's Entitled to his opinion and if he has apologised so be it !
He is not stupid
--- End quote ---
as above it went from slating to thanking
tazgti5 ive also seen you slating r-tech and for some reason getting pissed off and as you said getting sick to death of people blabbing on about r-tech when people recommend them :stupid:, at the end of the day you or pudding dont really know nothing about tuning a 2.0 tfsi.. theres my opinion
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version