MK5 Golf GTI
All Things Mk5 => Modifications & Technical Area => Performance Modifications => Topic started by: Stooey on August 04, 2015, 06:53:36 pm
-
I'm looking either fit a catch can on do a pcv delete but I'm unsure which is better? What are the pros and cons for each? I'm guessing the r-tech delete will be better as they know there stuff but just after finding out a bit more if anybody has any info.
Cheers
-
I've seen a lot of mixed views on this. A catch can is probably my choice, as deletes can cause excess pressure inside the engine. plus a catch can filters some stuff from passing through the engine.
Thing is you need to get a well designed catch can to make it worth while, think the Draft 42 Designs one was mentioned as a good one in the apst but don't quote me.
-
The catch cans are no better than the deletes, all (aside from the R-Tech setup) reduce the breathing capacity of the engine (both cam and crank) down to a 19mm hole (or less), which does cause excessive pressure and leads to smoking on overrun/idle.
The R-Tech kit runs a separate large bore breather for the cam and crank gases. No back pressure, no hot oil vapors making their way back in to the turbo intake etc.
Get the R-Tech kit - Cheaper than a decent catch can setup and does a better job
-
I may consider that myself actually, thanks for that.
-
Thanks for the reply lads, think the r-tech delete is the way to go then :drinking:
-
Looks like R-tech have stopped selling this now :confused:
-
Yes they have, but apparently AKS have started to make / develop this own now :confused:
-
Wonder why they stopped making them?
I've just opted to replace the front and rear PCV with new OEM ones. The rear PCV is original so on 128k miles. :scared:
-
Because PCV deletes causes issues with crankcase pressure and burning oil/smoke. Mine was OK at first but started with age/time. I'm now back on the factory PCV and will be keeping it that way
-
Because PCV deletes causes issues with crankcase pressure and burning oil/smoke. Mine was OK at first but started with age/time. I'm now back on the factory PCV and will be keeping it that way
Thought so. Thanks dan.
-
Went to pick the stuff up today and the rear pcv doesn’t have s valve in it. Just a flexi metal hose and short rubber hose that attaches to the cam cover. Is that right?
Thought it had a valve in it.
-
As long as you don't have a P revision front PCV, then it doesn't need a checkvalve. I'm currently using an N and the latest is R - both are fine without a checkvalve in the rear pipe
-
As long as you don't have a P revision front PCV, then it doesn't need a checkvalve. I'm currently using an N and the latest is R - both are fine without a checkvalve in the rear pipe
Lovely. Thanks agains. I’ll replace the pipe anyway as I am stripping it.