General > Random Chat

Premium Watches to buy.

<< < (4/5) > >>

Frodo-anni:
A watch to appreciate in value would have to be a Rolex surely.

A Rolex is out of my price range, but I am looking at Omegas, I just can't decide on a speedy with hesalite crystal or a planet ocean. That would be regularly worn and handed down in the future.

wycombe_gti:

--- Quote from: Frodo-anni on January 11, 2018, 04:01:20 pm ---A watch to appreciate in value would have to be a Rolex surely.

A Rolex is out of my price range, but I am looking at Omegas, I just can't decide on a speedy with hesalite crystal or a planet ocean. That would be regularly worn and handed down in the future.

--- End quote ---

Relatively little appreciates, bar some quite niche runs of "classics", but takes time - and you need to have not worn them too much.
Have a 1969 Seamaster Cosmic with a silver dial, which I love. Also got a new Rolex Oyster Perpetual with a dark rhodium dial and the blue indicators, which I use more often as it's much more resilient. If you fancy something that stands out, I nearly bought a Rolex Milgauss.

gtipirelli:
I managed to bag myself a stainless steel Rolex Daytona about 4 years ago at just over list price. A new version was launched about a year ago and the old version shot up 20% overnight for a nice used one

Unfortunately the wait for a new one is stretching to many years unless you are VERY well connected

Agree that stainless Rolex’s are the way to go

pudding:
I'm against the grain with Rolexes.   They might be a good investment if you have enough surplus capital to sink into it, but imo they are ugly and crass wrist bling for Bentley boy footballers  :sick:

I'd rather sink the money into precious metals or cyber currency.

MIJ_JAGGER:
Not a fan of any of the Seamasters personally, I’d rather a Submariner or the GMT ll if we’re talking looks.

Can’t beat a classic Casio though

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version